Legal Opinion

Arnett v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1932No. 4 Div. 608PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The safe practice in felony trials is not to permit the jury to depart from the presence of the court even on adjournment unless attended by a sworn officer, and not to permit them to separate even then. Robbins v. State, 49 Ala. 394; Williams v. State, 45 Ala. 57; Bell v. State, 140 Ala. 57, 37 So. 281; 16 Corpus Juris, 1078.

But such separation pending a trial is said to be not necessarily ground for a new trial, but is sufficient to show a prima facie right to it, and the burden is upon the state, after such separation is shown, to prove that the jurors conversed with no one affecting the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Thompson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Beauregard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Palmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. King v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API