Legal Opinion

Crossett v. St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1972No. SC 33Published

1Opinion of the Court

269 So.2d 869 (1972)

George D. CROSSETT

v.

ST. LOUIS FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO., a Corporation.

SC 33.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 30, 1972.

Rives, Peterson, Pettus, Conway & Burge, Birmingham, for appellant.

Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart, Birmingham, for appellee St. Louis Fire and Marine Ins. Co.

Cato & Hicks, Birmingham, for appellee Cavell Co., Inc.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree in a declaratory judgment action. The trial court held that the bodily injury liability coverage, provided for under the omnibus clause of a homeowners insurance policy, did not apply to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. American States Ins. Co., Western Pac. Div. v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Crossett v. St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HannaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Barker v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API