Legal Opinion

Wittmayer v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 25, 1989No. 86-1266; CA A49768PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

In this garnishment proceeding, appellant appeals an order granting the Maughs’ (claimants) claim of exemption from garnishment. We affirm.

Many of the facts are not in dispute. Respondent Wittmayer, as personal representative of the estate of Alice Edwards, is vendor under a land sale contract (the contract) dated March 21, 1980. In May, 1988, appellant obtained a judgment against respondent for $5,500, plus costs. Appellant then served writs of garnishment on (1) L-S II, a partnership and successor to the vendee under the contract, and (2) Eugene Escrow Service, Inc. (the escrow). The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. LeachOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Levins v. StakeOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wakefield, Fries & Co. v. ParkhurstOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Anderson v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. McCallums, Inc. v. Mountain Title Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sticka v. Mellon Bank (DE) Natl. Assoc. (In Re Martin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1994
  2. von Gemmingen v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API