In Re Estate of Conner
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentSmith, J.
(dissenting in part) — I concur in all the majority opinion except Division IV which holds Mr. Updegraff, executor, incompetent as a witness because of the dead man statute, Code section 622.4. I do not think our prior decisions absolutely require this holding and if they be construed so to do I think they should be overruled.
The statute, so far as pertinent here, provides: “No party to any action or proceeding * * * shall be * * * a witness in regard to any personal transaction or communication between such witness and a person * * * deceased * *■ * against the * *= * legatee [or] devisee *…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Doty's Adm'r v. Doty's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Exsted v. ExstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Bryant v. LivermoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Burton v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.