Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Estate of Conner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 24, 1948No. 47213Published

1DissentSmith, J.

(dissenting in part) — I concur in all the majority opinion except Division IV which holds Mr. Updegraff, executor, incompetent as a witness because of the dead man statute, Code section 622.4. I do not think our prior decisions absolutely require this holding and if they be construed so to do I think they should be overruled.

The statute, so far as pertinent here, provides: “No party to any action or proceeding * * * shall be * * * a witness in regard to any personal transaction or communication between such witness and a person * * * deceased * *■ * against the * *= * legatee [or] devisee *…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doty's Adm'r v. Doty's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Exsted v. ExstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Bryant v. LivermoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  4. Burton v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API