United States v. Michael Carbone and Louis MacChiarelli
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from a narcotics conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 173-74, reversal is urged not on the usual grounds of insufficiency, entrapment or error in the charge, but solely on the basis of inconsistency in the verdict — and this despite the seemingly insurmountable hurdle of Mr. Justice Holmes’ well-known opinion in Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932). While the arguments here presented do credit to the ingenuity of counsel, we are constrained to reject them and affirm the convictions.
The indictment, in the District Court, for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- United States v. Ronald BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Alphonse SiscaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. William Herbert Greene, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.