Legal Opinion

Tanner v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1959No. 20386PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

1. The rule providing for reasonable notice to the opposite party or his counsel and an opportunity to be heard as to whether or not a bill of exceptions is correct before certification by the trial judge (Code, Ann., § 6-908.1) was not intended to, and does not, in any way modify, limit, or repeal the requirement for service of the bill of exceptions, or waiver thereof, after it has been certified. Mauldin v. Mauldin, 203 Ga. 123, 124 (45 S. E. 2d 818); Conley Housing Corp. v. Coleman, 210 Ga. 219 (78 S. E. 2d 503).

2. Respecting service of the bill of exceptions in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. MauldinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Irwin v. LeCrawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Conley Housing Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newman v. American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API