Conley Housing Corp. v. Coleman
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. The rule providing for reasonable notice to the opposite party or his counsel and an opportunity to be heard on the question as to whether or not a bill of exceptions is correct before certification by the trial judge (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 735; Code, Ann. Supp., § 6-908.1) was not intended to, and does not, in any way modify, limit, or repeal the requirement for service of the bill of exceptions after it has been certified. Code § 6-911; Mauldin v. Mauldin, 203 Ga. 123, 124 (45 S. E. 2d 818).
2. In the present case counsel for the defendants in error approved “the foregoing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mauldin v. MauldinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Irwin v. LeCrawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Ginn v. GinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Sistrunk v. Lipscomb-Weyman-Connors Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Ivey v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tanner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Lee Merritt Hatchery, Inc. v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956