Legal Opinion

Ratcliff v. San Diego Baseball Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1938No. Civ. 2044PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for damages for injuries suffered by the plaintiff as a result of being hit with a baseball bat which had slipped from the hands of a player.

The plaintiff purchased a ticket for a seat in the grandstand of the playing field operated by the San Diego Baseball Club for a game between that club and the Sacramento Club. A regular aisle or passageway ran along the front of this grandstand,- being parallel to the line between home plate and first base, and some forty or forty-five feet distant from that line. The central part of the grandstand, being that portion which was back of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Club Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Edling v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Allan v. Snow Summit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Lackner v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API