Legal Opinion
Matthew V. Vaughan, et al. v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 29, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00479Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MATTHEW V. VAUGHAN, et al., Case No. 25-cv-00479-ASK 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 87, 88, 89, 91 10 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs Matthew and Amy Vaughan sue Defendants for claims arising from a real estate 14 transaction gone wrong. Dkt. 84.1 Defendants move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint 15 (“SAC”). Dkts. 87, 88, 89, 91. Having considered the briefing, and with the benefit of oral 16 argument on April 1, 2026, the Court GRANTS…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.