United States v. Aikens
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE MOTION TO SUPPRESS
TAKASUGI, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants Roosevelt Augustus Rodney (“Rodney”), Lay Chai Hai (“Lay”), and George Gordon Aikens (“Aikens”) seek an order to suppress all marihuana and other evidence seized during a search of the Christina M on the basis that such search and seizure was in violation of the defendants’ fourth amendment rights. Defendants William Snyder (“Snyder”), Ensebio Samudio-Jimenez (“Samudio-Jimenez”) and Manuel Angulo-Castillo (“Angulo-Castillo”) have joined in one or more of such motions to suppress.
Generally,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- United States v. Cardona-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. AikinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. AikinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. AikinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.