Legal Opinion

United States v. Aikens

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 12, 1988No. CR 88-359-01 to CR 88-359-08PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE MOTION TO SUPPRESS

TAKASUGI, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants Roosevelt Augustus Rodney (“Rodney”), Lay Chai Hai (“Lay”), and George Gordon Aikens (“Aikens”) seek an order to suppress all marihuana and other evidence seized during a search of the Christina M on the basis that such search and seizure was in violation of the defendants’ fourth amendment rights. Defendants William Snyder (“Snyder”), Ensebio Samudio-Jimenez (“Samudio-Jimenez”) and Manuel Angulo-Castillo (“Angulo-Castillo”) have joined in one or more of such motions to suppress.

Generally,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. United States v. Cardona-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. AikinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. AikinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. AikinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API