Schulte v. Lestershire Boot & Shoe Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Broome county. Action by John Schulte against the Lestershire Boot & Shoe Company and others. From an order setting aside the taxation of costs, and directing a retaxation, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.
Pursuant to a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the Lestershire Boot & Shoe Company, the plaintiff performed work, labor, and services, and furnished materials necessary to erect a building, upon the property of the respondent, and after the completion of the building, and on or about the 12th of July, 1892, the plaintiff filed a notice of lien in writing in the office of the clerk of the county of Broome, where said premises were situated, and thereafter commenced this action to enforce the lien. The Lestershire Boot & Shoe Company answered the complaint, and the issue joined…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cythe v. La FontainNew York Supreme Court · 1868
- Budd v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1863
- Pfister v. StummThe Superior Court of New York City · 1894
- Chapin v. ChurchillNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Hall v. DennerleinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kiernan v. Agricultural InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Sanborn-Cutting Co. v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1919