Sanborn-Cutting Co. v. Butler
Oregon Supreme Court
From Tillamook: George E. Bagley, Judge. In Banc. On the eleventh day of April, 1917, plaintiff began an action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon an account, together with interest thereon from an average date.
Read the full summary
From Tillamook: George E. Bagley, Judge. In Banc. On the eleventh day of April, 1917, plaintiff began an action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon an account, together with interest thereon from an average date. On the twenty-sixth day of the same month, defendants served upon plaintiff, and subsequently filed, an offer of compromise in the following form: “The defendants in the above-entitled cause hereby offer to allow judgment to be given against them in said cause for the sum of $126.” This offer was not accepted. On the same day an answer was filed, admitting the original…
1Opinion
On Petition eor Rehearing.
(179 Pac. 573.)
In Banc.
HARRIS, J.
Because of the earnestness displayed by the defendants in their petition for a rehearing we have again examined the question presented by the record; but we arrive at the same conclusion that was reached in the original opinion: Sanborn-Cutting Co. v. Butler, ante, p. 619 (178 Pac. 228). The plaintiff corporation says in its complaint, which was filed on April 11, 1917, that between July 7, 1914, and September 20,1915, and at the instance and request of the defendants, who are partners, it sold goods to, paid expenses and rendered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Hawley v. DawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Smith v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Kellogg v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Sanborn-Cutting Co. v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.