Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 7, 2013No. 12-K-1296PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
_JjWe granted the state’s application to consider the rulings below that defendant/respondent is not subject to Louisiana’s sex offender registration and notification provisions and therefore may not be prosecuted for failing to abide by those requirements. For reasons that follow, we reverse and remand this case for further proceedings.
On October 25, 2010, the state charged defendant by bill of information with failing to maintain his registration as a convicted sex offender by failing to appear for his quarterly registration with the Jefferson Parish Sheriffs Office, in violation of La.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of FinanceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- State v. LegendreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Louisiana v. Quincy McKinnies, Jr.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- State v. ArmsteadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. FranklinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. FranklinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. MarcelinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.