Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Johnson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 1998No. 96-04804Published

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

James Quigley, pro se, appeals from the dismissal of his legal malpractice action for lack of prosecution. Stephen Johnson cross-appeals and contends that the trial court erred in finding that the amended complaint was properly verified. We reverse the dismissal and affirm as to the cross-appeal.

Quigley filed an amended complaint alleging legal malpractice, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of contract. In response, Johnson filed a pleading styled “Defendants’ Motions Addressed to Amended Complaint,” which contained two motions to strike and seven motions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lukowsky v. Hauser & Metsch, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. SchneemilchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API