Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Parker Tractor & Implement Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2014No. 2012-CA-01684-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANDLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶1. This is a direct appeal from the Coahoma County Circuit Court’s dismissal of a garnishment action as time-barred by the seven-year limitations period.1 We affirm the circuit court.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

¶ 2. This is the third appeal this Court has decided arising out of litigation over a defective combine Edward J. Johnson Jr. purchased from Parker Tractor & Implement Co., Inc. (“Parker Tractor”) in 1994. First, in 2002, this Court affirmed a $90,000 circuit-court judgment in favor of Johnson. (“State I ”).2 In State I, Deere & Co. (“Deere”) defended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Broome v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Deere & Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Dockins v. AllredMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Townes v. Rusty Ellis Builder, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. PARKER TRACTOR & IMPLEMENT COMPANY, INC. v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Booneville Collision Repair, Inc. v. City of Booneville, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Booneville Collision Repair, Inc. v. City of Booneville, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API