Legal Opinion

State v. Fritch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1928No. 26,897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appeal from the order denying defendants a new trial in proceedings to enforce payment of delinquent taxes on real estate in Kittson county.

The court, made findings reducing the valuation and tax upon the several tracts. But the claim is made that as so reduced it is still excessive. It is further contended that the assessments as made-in the two townships involved reveal such an unfair discrimination between improved and unimproved lands that the assessments upon defendant’s unimproved lands should be reduced to a proportionate level with the assessments upon the improved.

The lands in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. KendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. San Francisco National Bank v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes for 1920Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. State v. Koochiching Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. State v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. State of Minnesota v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
  4. Kalscheuer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. In Re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API