Legal Opinion

People v. Gomez

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Miriam R. Best, J.

Defendants are charged in a single accusatory instrument with three counts of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). Defendant Gomez now moves this court to dismiss the information as facially insufficient, pursuant to CPL 100.40. He also moves to dismiss the charges against him *645pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (b) and 170.30 (1) (e). Defendant Crespo has joined in these applications. For the reasons that follow, the motion to dismiss is denied.

Facial Sufficiency

The complaint alleges that on January 15, 2010, at approximately 9:15 a.m., at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API