Wishkah Boom Co. v. Greenwood Timber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered May 15, 1914, in favor of the plaintiff, in consolidated actions to foreclose liens upon logs, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Respondent brought two actions to foreclose liens for driving and booming logs on the Wishkah river, which actions were consolidated in the court below.
Appellant is engaged in logging on a branch of the Wishkah river, and respondent, by means of splash dams, drives appellant’s logs down the river to tide water, where respondent maintains and operates a boom wherein it booms and *569rafts the logs. Each of respondent’s complaints, in the fourth paragraph, alleges that the boom company, prior to June 1, 1911, duly established a schedule of uniform rates and tolls, and that the rates so established…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Swedish Hospital v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. P.U.D. v. Dept. of P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- State ex rel. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. DenneyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.