Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1937No. 11990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

Although “a formal power of attorney . . is subject to a strict construction,” and “general terms in it are restricted to consistency with the controlling purpose, and will not extend the authority so as to add new and distinct powers different from the special powers expressly delegated” (White v. Young, 122 Ga. 830, 51 S. E. 28; Claflin v. Continental Jersey Works, 85 Ga. 27, 42, 11 S. E. 721; Born v. Simmons, 111 Ga. 869, 36 S. E. 956), yet in such a construction the general statutory rule also should be observed, that “the agent’s authority shall be construed to include…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claflin & Co. v. Continental Jersey WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Lynch v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Martin v. McLainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Strong v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. United Leather Co. v. ProudfitSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leeds Building Products, Inc. v. Sears Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. LeCraw v. LeCrawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. John Bean Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Wheeless v. GelzerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991
  5. Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API