Legal Opinion
Martin v. McLain
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 8, 1935No. 24550PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
E. B. Martin sued certain named defendants, trading as the “McLain Estate,” for the purchase-price of a certain peanut-threshing machine. He attached to his petition the order for this machine, signed “McLain Estate” by “G. K. McLain.” He also attached to his petition an instrument which is materially as follows: “Know all men by these presents that we, Mrs. Ruby McLain Duggan and Miss Alma McLain, . . and J. P. McLain, . . and Mrs. G. D. Brim . . have constituted, made, and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute, and appoint G. K. McLain our true and lawful attorney in fact,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Potts-Thompson Liquor Co. v. PottsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Becker v. DonalsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Ætna Life Insurance v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Mason v. Atlanta Fire Co. Number 1Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Wadley, Jones & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Baker v. Brannen/Goddard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Nickerson v. Candler Building, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Hunter v. Benamy Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Ramsey v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Ragan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.