Petriello v. Indresano
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanlon, J.
The defendants, Albert Indresano, Jr. (Albert), and Joseph Indresano (Joseph), seek review of G. L. c. 258E harassment prevention orders (orders) issued against them. 2 , 3 They argue that Veronica Higgins-Sullivan, acting under a power of attorney (POA) executed by the plaintiff, Rose Petriello, lacked standing to apply for these orders on Petriello’s behalf. The defendants also claim that the abusive conduct that Higgins-Sullivan alleged did not meet the requirements for issuing the orders. Although we are satisfied that Higgins-Sullivan had standing to apply for the orders, due to the very…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- O'BRIEN v. BorowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- United States v. Gary BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Seney v. MorhyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gassman v. ReasonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Ellis E. v. Finn F.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- V.J. v. N.J.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017