Legal Opinion

Hougie v. Hougie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered April 17, 1998, which denied defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as seeks equitable distribution of defendant’s enhanced earning capacity as an investment banker, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Preliminarily we note that whether a particular marital asset, such as the enhanced earning capacity attributable to a particular career, is subject to equitable distribution is an issue that can be decided prior to trial (see, e.g., Elkus v Elkus, *162169 AD2d 134, lv dismissed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Elkus v. ElkusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. West v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halaby v. HalabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Moll v. MollNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Spence v. SpenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Fanelli v. FanelliNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API