Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 18, 1992No. 2910258PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC) filed a complaint against Reaver S. Daniel, alleging that Daniel owed $7,417.44 pursuant to an interest-bearing contract for the financing of an automobile. Daniel denied the allegations and filed a counterclaim against FMCC. After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court granted FMCC a judgment in the amount of $7,500, plus costs. Daniel's motion for a new trial was denied pursuant to Rule 59.1, Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.
Daniel appeals, contending that the trial court erred in denying her counterclaim because, she claims, FMCC failed to dispose of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Dothan v. Rikki Tikki Tavi, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Lavender v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Greene v. Associates (In Re Green)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MathisMississippi Supreme Court · 1995