Roden v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1ConcurrenceLee Ann Dauphinot, Justice
I agree with the majority’s holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury that Gerald Smith was an accomplice as a matter of law or by refusing to submit the issue to the jury of whether he was an accomplice as a matter of fact. I also agree with the ultimate outcome of the opinion, but I write separately to address a pervasive problem raised by Appellant. It is a problem that has been addressed by federal courts but that continues as routine practice in some jurisdictions — selecting more than one jury from a single venire.
As our sister court in Tyler reminded us,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- United States v. Robert E. CapuaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Linnell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- United States v. Joe Frederick JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Kirkland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.