Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1921No. 9646Published

Appeal from District Court, Eastland County; Geo. L. Davenport, Judge. Suit by the Eranklin Plumbing Company, a partnership composed of R. E. Franklin and others, against G. W. Daniels and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

This suit was instituted by the Franklin Plumbing Company, a partnership composed of R. E. Franklin and others, against G. W. Daniels and C. H. Daniels, to recover the contract price for certain plumbing alleged to have been installed by the plaintiffs in the Daniels Hotel at Cisco, Tex. The contract declared upon was in writing, and provided that the plumbing company was to furnish the material and install all plumbing in the' building. It was further provided that the material put in and work done should be under the supervision of R. S. Glenn, an architect, and that the decision of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Boettler v. TendickTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Boston Store v. SchleuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Kettler Brass Manufacturing Co. v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API