Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sikes v. General Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 17, 1978No. 78-144 & 78-162Published

1DissentDarrell Hickman, Justice

I dissent from the result reached by the majority because I feel that mandamus is not the proper remedy under these facts.

It is well-settled law that mandamus will not lie where there is an adequate remedy at law. It is essential that before the writ can be issued, the petitioner must show a clear and certain legal right to the relief sought and have no other adequate remedy at law. Girley v. Wood, Judge, 258 Ark. 408, 525 S.W. 2d 454 (1975). The purpose of the writ is not to establish a legal right, but to enforce a legal right that already exists. Naylor v. Goza, Judge, 232 Ark. 515, 338…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Girley v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Naylor v. GozaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. Mothershead v. PonderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API