Legal Opinion

Girley v. Wood

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1975No. 75-58PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

The only question involved in this petition for mandamus is whether we should require the circuit court to hold a more extensive hearing than it held on the right of Twin City Motors, Inc. to an order of delivery in a replevin action against petitioner. There is no question about the adequacy of notice and a hearing was held before the order was issued. Petitioner contends that when the suit is actually a possessory action by the assignee of the seller against the buyer of personal property based upon an alleged default by the buyer on an installment payment…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wells v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Henderson v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Jackson v. MunsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. First National Mortgage Co. v. Arkmo Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API