Legal Opinion
United States v. Quaker Industrial Alcohol Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 1932No. 14174PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
This suit at law was brought by the United States upon three permit bonds in which the Quaker Industrial Alcohol Corporation was principal and New Amsterdam Casualty Company surety. The bonds were given to guarantee the lawful handling of alcohol in connection with the operation of a distillery, a bonded warehouse and a denaturing plant, respectively, all of which constituted the industrial alcohol plant of the principal. At the outset of the trial the government conceded that there could be no recovery upon either of the first two bonds and the ease proceeded and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Bonding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Pickens County v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- United States ex rel. J. B. Van Sciver Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
- Pittsburg—Buffalo Co. v. American Fidelity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. U. S. Industrial Alcohol Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1934
- State v. GreggeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Golden West Construction Co. v. United States ex rel. BernadotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Golden West Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.