Legal Opinion
Pearlman v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided July 21, 1959No. Claim No. 34517PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBbrNAbd Ryast, P. J.
Claimant sues to recover $3,400 the bid price on Addendum No. 2, for a contract dated April 16, 1956 for construction work for alterations at the State Office Building, 80 Centre Street, New York City. By virtue of a notice to admit dated February 12, 1959 and duly served pursuant to section 322 of the Civil Practice Act, to which the Attorney-*496General made no response as tlie statute requires, certain facts are established. {Easley v. State of New York, 10 Misc 2d 370 [1957].) These facts are as follows: Claimant submitted his bid proposal (for the work initially advertised to be done) in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Psaty v. DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Harvey Chalmers & Son, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Hornstein v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Luther Knight v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Litten v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Carr v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
- Anders v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
- Buffalo Electric Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.