Legal Opinion

Owenby v. Holley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 2002No. A02A0580PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

In this action for specific performance, we reverse the grant of summary judgment to the defendants-appellees and affirm the denial of the plaintiff-appellant’s motion, holding that genuine issues of material fact remain for trial. The relevant facts follow.

In 1982, George L. Owenby executed a warranty deed conveying property to his sister, Lucy O. Mayfield, in exchange for $25,000. In the deed, Owenby reserved “an option to re-purchase property for $25,000.00 if grantee or her heirs decide to resale [sic] the property.” In connection with the sale, Mayfield executed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Wadley Lumber Co. v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Hancock v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  4. Bulloch South, Inc. v. GosaiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Wiley v. Tom Howell & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holcim (US), Inc. v. AMDG, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. CDM Custom Homes, Inc. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. WHITE HOUSE INN AND SUITS, INC. v. City of Warm SpringsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Carden v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API