Rickert v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1ConcurrenceStras, Justice
I concur only in the result reached by the court. Unlike the majority, I would not rely on the interests-of-justice exception in Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(b) (2010), because Rickert has waived that argument. At every stage of this appeal, Rickert has explicitly disclaimed any reliance on the interests-of-justice exception to the two-year filing deadline for petitions for postconvietion relief under subdivision 4(b) of section 590.01. The question actually briefed by the parties and preserved for appeal — whether Rickert has a right to one full substantive review of his conviction under…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.