Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rickert v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 2011No. A08-2269Published

1ConcurrenceStras, Justice

I concur only in the result reached by the court. Unlike the majority, I would not rely on the interests-of-justice exception in Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(b) (2010), because Rickert has waived that argument. At every stage of this appeal, Rickert has explicitly disclaimed any reliance on the interests-of-justice exception to the two-year filing deadline for petitions for postconvietion relief under subdivision 4(b) of section 590.01. The question actually briefed by the parties and preserved for appeal — whether Rickert has a right to one full substantive review of his conviction under…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API