Legal Opinion

State v. Furnier

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2013No. 12CA3474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Furnier,

2013-Ohio-455.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 12CA3474 : vs. : : DANIEL R. FURNIER, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT : ENTRY Defendant-Appellant. : : Released: 02/06/13 _____________________________________________________________ APPEARANCES: Bryan Scott Hicks, Lebanon, Ohio, for Appellant. Mark E. Kuhn, Scioto County Prosecutor and Matthew A. Wisecup, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Portsmouth, Ohio, for Appellee. _____________________________________________________________…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Goodwin, 23337 (5-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Portco, Inc. v. Eye Specialists, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. Robinson, 2007 Ca 00349 (11-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. GrubeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. FurnierOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API