Legal Opinion

Washington Off Highway Vehicle Alliance v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2012No. 86602-3PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 This case concerns Washington Constitution article II, section 40’s refund provision, which states that a refund of motor vehicle fuel tax revenues is a “highway purpose[ ].” Wash. Const, art. II, § 40(d). Specifically at issue is the legislature’s statutory refund program, which places one percent of fuel tax revenues into a special fund to benefit *228off-road vehicle (ORV), nonmotorized, and nonhighway road recreational users for fuel consumed on nonhighway roads. In 2009, the legislature appropriated a portion of this special fund for the Parks and Recreation Commission’s (Parks) general…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Automotive United Trades Organization v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Darkenwald v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Auto. United Trades Org. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Department Of Labor & Industries v. Rito BrisenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Fort Discovery Corp. v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API