Washington Off Highway Vehicle Alliance v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 This case concerns Washington Constitution article II, section 40’s refund provision, which states that a refund of motor vehicle fuel tax revenues is a “highway purpose[ ].” Wash. Const, art. II, § 40(d). Specifically at issue is the legislature’s statutory refund program, which places one percent of fuel tax revenues into a special fund to benefit *228off-road vehicle (ORV), nonmotorized, and nonhighway road recreational users for fuel consumed on nonhighway roads. In 2009, the legislature appropriated a portion of this special fund for the Parks and Recreation Commission’s (Parks) general…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In re the Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Automotive United Trades Organization v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Darkenwald v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Auto. United Trades Org. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Department Of Labor & Industries v. Rito BrisenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Fort Discovery Corp. v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.