Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Pure Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1936No. 6 Div. 936Published

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNP2R, Justice.

The appeal is by the probate judge of Jefferson county from a peremptory writ of mandamus, requiring him to accept for record a deed tendered by petitioner, without the payment of the filing tax specified in section 21% of the General Revenue Law of 1927. General Acts 1927, p. 163.

Has petitioner shown a clear specific legal right to the thing demanded, essential in mandamus proceedings? Smith v. McQueen, ante, p. 90, 166 So.. 788. We conclude the proper answer is in the negative, and upon more than one ground.

Looking through form to substance, we think it clearly appears…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PraetoriansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Baldwin v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Van WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Fitts v. National Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Mobile Temperance Hall Ass'n v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API