Legal Opinion
Ballard v. Insomniac Holdings, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 17, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00811Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AUSTIN BALLARD, Case No. 25-cv-00811-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 INSOMNIAC HOLDINGS, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 14 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss. The court held a hearing on June 6, 2025. 14 For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is DENIED. 15 16 BACKGROUND 17 Plaintiff Austin Ballard brings this proposed class action against defendant Insomniac 18 Holdings LLC (“Insomniac”), asserting one claim under the Video Privacy Protection Act 19…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.