Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State Ex Rel. Nevada Tax Commission

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1967No. 5358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

The Nevada Constitution provides that a proposal which has become law by referendum of the voters shall not be amended except by the direct vote of the people.1 The purpose of this proceeding in prohibition is to determine whether the Local School Support Tax Law, enacted by the legislature in 1967, violates the constitutional proscription against amending a referred law, since its effect is to increase the rate of the Sales and Use Tax authorized by referendum of the voters in 1956. For the reasons hereafter expressed we hold that the 1967 Local School Tax…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gibson v. MasonNevada Supreme Court · 1869
  2. State v. TrolsonNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Riter v. DouglassNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. PelosiArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. BartineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. William Penn School District v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Westinghouse Beverage Group, Inc. v. Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Las Vegas v. MacKNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of North Las Vegas v. Central Telephone Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Delawareans for Educ. Opportunity v. CarneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API