Legal Opinion
Floyd Rairdon Hayes v. United States of America, Cecil H. Bennett v. United States of America, Stanley Burke Clevenger v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1964No. 17363-17365PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Floyd Rairdon Hayes, Cecil H. Bennett and Stanley Burke Clevenger, hereinafter sometimes jointly referred to as appellants, have taken timely appeals from their convictions and sentences upon the counts of a sixteen count indictment upon which each stands convicted. Count I of the indictment, which is the count most vigorously attacked, charges the three appellants and four co-defendants, Karl Rogers, Robert Williams, Roy Williams and Earl Dean Williams, with conspiracy under 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 to violate 29 U.S.C.A. § 501 (c). Section 501(c), effective…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. AgueciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Carlos Garza De Luna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Michael Joseph Gurleski and Dorothy Villafranca v. United States of America, Frank Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Michael Lemonakis, United States of America v. Paul EntenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.