Neagle v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.
The appellants instituted separate actions against the respondent to recover damages for injuries resulting from an automobile accident. On April 20, 1921, at about eight .o’clock in the evening, the automobile in which appellants were riding was traveling westerly on East Eleventh street, in the city of Tacoma, and collided With a support to an overhead crossing. . These supports are twelve inches in width *529and about twenty-five feet apart. East Eleventh street is planked for a width of twenty-five feet, the support on the north side standing out into the highway so that the south edge is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilson v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Shearer v. Town of BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Masterson v. LeonardWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Beach v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shea v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- North Spokane Irrigation District No. 8 v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Denney v. PowerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.