Legal Opinion

The International Nickel Co., Inc. v. Trammel Crow Distribution Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1986No. 85-2855PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

This case involves the unexplained disappearance of a large amount of nickel from a warehouse. The International Nickel Company (INCO), owner of the nickel, obtained a summary judgment against the warehouse owner, Trammel Crow Distribution Corporation (Trammel Crow). However, Trammel Crow prevailed because the judgment gave effect to a limitation of liability clause in the warehouse contract, and INCO was awarded only a fraction of its actual damages. INCO seeks to avoid the limitation clause and recover its full actual damages. We reverse the summary judgment because…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron & Metal Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Okon v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Ashford Development, Inc. v. USLife Real Estate Services Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ellis v. WaldropTexas Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Krystal Gurule v. Land Guardian, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Blue Valley Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. High Plains Natural Gas Company v. Warren Petroleum Company, a Division of Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Pride Companies, L.P. v. Johnson (In Re Pride Companies, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
  5. Coutinho & Ferrostaal Inc. v. M/V Federal RhineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API