Legal Opinion

Wade, County Superintendent v. Eakin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 2735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Jefferson County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Application by W. A. Eakin for a peremptory writ of mandamus to L. L. Wade, County Superintendent of Jefferson County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.

On February 25, 1911, W. A. Eakin, defendant in error, for himself and all others similarly situated, in the district court of Jefferson county, filed his motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel L. L. Wade, as county superintendent of Jefferson county, plaintiff in error, to call a school meeting in that part of school district No. 8,' alleged by him to have theretofore been properly detached from the original' school district No. 8, for the purpose of organizing a school district in said territory. Later he filed an amended .motion, and stated that the county attorney declined to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. School Dist. No. 44, Caddo Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Continental Ins. Co. v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Eakin v. Chapman, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. School Dist. No. 68, Noble County v. WollingfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API