Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Peters

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 99-1159PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent violated DR 9-102. The evidence indicates that during most of the year in which respondent delayed paying his client’s medical bills, the balance in his trust account was insufficient to make those payments and that insufficiency was caused by respondent’s personal use of the funds. Respondent also violated DR 6-101(A)(3). His delay in paying Woods’s medical bills for nearly a year was a breach not only of his promise to Woods in the settlement statement, but also of his agreement with Chiropractic to pay the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MarkovichOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. KealyOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. PetersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. KealyOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API