Legal Opinion

Mackie v. Metropolitan Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. Amann, Jr., J.

The sole issue raised by the parties is whether or not the *385"stacking” of insurance policies is permitted in the present circumstances. The respondent contends that the tender of payment by the Royal Insurance Company bars further payment under its policy.

In the present case, the petitioner’s decedent was killed in a vehicular accident which occurred in January of 1991. Ms. Laura Mackie, the decedent, had been a passenger in an auto driven by Peter Pacaro. The vehicle was neither registered nor insured.

The Royal Insurance Company had issued a policy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sisson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. IslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Allstate Insurance v. OrsiniNew York Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cain v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Rifkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API