Tyson v. State Bank of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit against the defendant to recover the amount of a bill of exchange drawn on one Bainbridye, which had .been left by the plaintiff with the defendant for collection. The facts were that Dorsey and Tyson on, &c., at Wheeling, drew a bill of exchange on Bainbridge at seventy days, payable to the order of Knox, Lloyd, and Co.; that the payees afterwards indorsed the bill to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff, before it became due, delivered the bill to the defendant at its branch at Lafayette, where *240it was agreed between the parties, that, for a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- S. & M. Allen v. Suydam & BoydNew York Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by12 opinions
- Saint Nicholas Bank v. State National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bailie v. Augusta Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Streissguth v. National German-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Simpson v. WaldbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- American Express Co. v. HaireIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.