Legal Opinion
King v. . Knapp
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The decision and judgment rendered at Special Term were clearly erroneous, in requiring the plaintiff to pay the whole purchase-money bid for the lot No. 45 Crosby street, on receiving a conveyance of only a portion of the lot. It is asserted, on the part of the defendants, that they had a good title to the whole lot No. 45 Crosby…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Lancaster v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Bullard v. BicknellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. LittlefieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Smithers v. SteinerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Ely v. MathewsNew York Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.