Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Roberts

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1893PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. M. Shepard, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

First, it is claimed on the part of the appellees, that the demurrer to the bill was properly sustained, upon the alleged ground, that the provisions of the contract described in it are not binding upon all the parties against whom it is sought to specifically enforce it. This contention is based upon the fact, that the contract does not mention or in any way refer to ¡Nellie F. P. Jones and Ann Auguste Roberts, although it is signed by them. As they are not referred to in the body of the agreement, it is said that their signatures thereto are mere surplusage.

The courts have passed upon a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batman v. MegowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Hepburn & Dundas v. AuldSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Dennis v. McCaggIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Harding v. ParshallIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Hoyt v. TuxburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. VieringIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Shubert v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Fowler Utilities Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Oles v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. Welty v. JacobsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API