Goddard v. Fairways Development General Partnership
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
At trial, the master-in-equity refused to dissolve or reform a planned unit development (PUD) and denied the plaintiffs other relief. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
Respondent, Fairways Development General Partnership (Developer), began developing the PUD in the early 1980’s. The original design envisioned the building of approximately 90 villas. To date, only five villas have been built; the last one was completed in 1982.
The PUD is governed by a “Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (Declarations) which grant superior voting rights to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Raven's Cove Townhomes, Inc. v. Knuppe Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Island Car Wash, Inc. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Richard Gill Co. v. Jackson's Landing Owners' Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- DOCKSIDE ASSO., INC. v. DetyensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kuznik v. Bees Ferry AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Chesus v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dixon v. Besco Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Kiriakides v. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.