Legal Opinion

State v. Barfield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 4, 1986No. 84-522; CA A34933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for sexual abuse in the second degree. ORS 163.415. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and in sustaining objections to questions which he asked on cross-examination of the state’s principal witness and to evidence that he offered to impeach her. We affirm.

In his motion to dismiss, defendant argued that it was constitutionally impermissible to try him for a misdemeanor in circuit court rather than in district court. Such a trial, he urged, would violate state and federal constitutional provisions because a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. EdmonsonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. City of Salem v. BrunerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GillilandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. HassanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API