People v. Palmer
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
Defendant, arrested on a misdemeanor charge (of violating section 1140 of the Penal Law), was, on Tuesday, October 1, 1946, brought before a judge of the City Court of Rochester, for arraignment. After he had been told what the complaint was, defendant was informed by the judge that he was “ entitled to counsel and an adjournment to procure counsel.” Asked if he understood the charge, he answered “ Yes.” Asked whether he pleaded guilty or not guilty, he replied that he did not “ know how to plead.” If defendant at that point had pleaded guilty, .there would, probably, have been a violation of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- MATTER OF UNITED PRESS ASSNS. v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People v. MarincicNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- People v. MartinNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1955
- People v. PassanteNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
- People v. JardineNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.