Legal Opinion

Foss v. Van Wagenen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAR from Circuit Court, Davison County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. . Action by Adam Foss against Frank Van Wagenen. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This case comes before us on appeal by the defendant from $ part of the judgment.entered in the court below. The judgment was rendered on the i6th day of May, 1903, and on the Toth day of September, nearly four months after the judgment was entered, the court made its order denying the motion for a new trial. The defendant in its notice of appeal has appealed simply from the judgment, specifying the part appealed from. It is recited in the abstract as to the notice of appeal as follows: “On the 10th day of September, 1903, after the entry of .the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Weber v. TschetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gade v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hawkins v. HubbardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Granger v. RollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Goodman v. MevorahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Stoffel v. SullivanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Cable Co. v. RathgeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Security State Bank v. Burnstad Farmers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API