Legal Opinion

Kauffman v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Bucles County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodward, J.

Reber’s confession of judgment bound only himself — but himself none the less for being made in an amicable *303action in which the'names of the Kauffmans, his former partners, ■were mentioned. It is argued, however, that a judgment so confessed by one partner for a partnership debt had the effect to discharge the other partners from future liability for the same debt.- Not so. The rule of the common law was altered by the 2d section of our act of assembly of 6th April, 1830, Purdon, 446, title, Judgments, pi. 33, which reads: “In all cases of amicable confession of judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  2. Houser v. IrvineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurlbut v. McKoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  2. Campbell v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Hubbard v. Montross Metal Shingle Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. McCahan v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API